Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles

  1. Borgida, E. (1972). National identity and the draft.  Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 1, 8-9.
  2. Nisbett, R.E. & Borgida, E. (1975).  Attribution and the psychology of prediction.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 932-943.
  3. Borgida, E. & Nisbett, R.E. (1977).  The differential impact of abstract vs. concrete information on decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 258-271.
  4. Borgida, E. (1978).  Scientific deduction—Evidence is not necessarily informative:  A reply to Wells and Harvey.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 477-482.
  5. Borgida, E. & White, P. (1978).  Social perception of rape victims:  The impact of legal reform.  Law and Human Behavior, 2, 339-351.
  6. Borgida, E. (1979).  Character proof and the fireside induction.  Law and Human Behavior, 3, 189-202.
  7. Locksley, A., Borgida, E., Brekke, N., & Hepburn, C. (1980).  Sex stereotypes and social judgment.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 821-831.
  8. Borgida, E. (1980).  Social judgment processes.  [Review of M. Fishbein (Ed.), (1980), Progress in social psychology, Volume 1.  Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates].  Science, 209 (4464), 1509.
  9. Borgida, E. & Campbell, B. (1982).  Belief relevance and attitude-behavior consistency:  The moderating role of personal experience.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 239-247.  [Reprinted in D.A. Schroeder, D.E. Johnson, & T.D. Jensen (Eds.), Contemporary readings in social psychology.  Chicago:  Nelson-Hall Publisher, 1985.]
  10. Heath, L., Kendzierski, D., & Borgida, E. (1982).  Evaluation of social programs:  A multi-methodological approach combining a delayed treatment true experiment and multiple time series.  Evaluation Review, 6, 233-246.
  11. Tukey, D. & Borgida, E. (1983).  An intra-subject approach to causal attribution.  Journal of Personality, 51, 137-151.
  12. Borgida, E., & Howard-Pitney, B. (1983).  Personal involvement and the robustness of perceptual salience effects.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 560-570.
  13. Morier, D.M. & Borgida, E. (1984).  The conjunction fallacy:  A task specific phenomenon?  Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 243-252.
  14. Frazier, P. & Borgida, E. (1985).  Rape trauma syndrome evidence in court.  American Psychologist, 40, 984-993.
  15. Harkness, A.R., DeBono, K.G., & Borgida, E. (1985).  Personal involvement and strategies for making contingency judgments:  A stake in the dating game makes a difference.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 22-32.
  16. Howard-Pitney, B., Borgida, E., & Omoto, A.M. (1986).  Personal involvement:  An examination of processing differences.  Social Cognition, 4, 39-57.
  17. Swim, J. & Borgida, E. (1987).  Public opinion on the psychological and legal aspects of televising rape trials.  Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17 (5), 507-517.  [Reprinted in L.S. Wrightman, C.E. Willis, & S. Kassin (Eds.), On the witness stand:  Controversies in the courtroom. Sage, 1987.]
  18. Young, J., Borgida, E., Sullivan, J., & Aldrich, J. (1987).  Personal agendas and the relationship between self-interest and voting behavior.  Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 64-71.
  19. Borgida, E. & Park, R. (1988).  The entrapment defense:  Juror comprehension and decision making.  Law and Human Behavior, 12 (1), 19-40.
  20. Brekke, N. & Borgida, E. (1988).  Expert psychological testimony in rape trials:  A social-cognitive analysis.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 372-386.
  21. Omoto, A.M. & Borgida, E. (1988).  Guess who might be coming to dinner?:  Personal involvement and racial stereotyping.  Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 571-593.
  22. Frazier, P. & Borgida, E. (1988).  Juror common understanding and the admissibility of rape trauma syndrome evidence in court.  Law and Human Behavior, 12, 101-122.
  23. Borgida, E. & DeBono, K.G. (1989).  Social hypothesis-testing and the role of expertise.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 212-221.
  24. Aldrich, J.H., Sullivan, J.L., & Borgida, E. (1989).  Foreign affairs and issue voting: Do presidential candidates “Waltz before a blind audience?” American Political Science Review, 83, 125-141.
  25. Swim, J., Borgida, E., Maruyama, G., & Myers, D. (1989).  McKay vs. McKay:  Is there a case for gender biased evaluations?  Psychological Bulletin, 105, 409-429.
  26. Borgida, E., Gresham, A., Swim, J., Bull, M., & Gray, E. (1989).  Expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases:  An empirical investigation of partisan orientation.  Family Law Quarterly, 23 (3), 433-450.
  27. Sullivan, J.L., Aldrich, J.H., Borgida, E., & Rahn, W. (1990).  Candidate appraisal and human nature:  Man and superman in the 1984 election.  Political Psychology, 11 (3), 459-484.
  28. Borgida, E., DeBono, K.G., & Buckman, L.A. (1990).  Cameras in the courtroom:  The effects of media coverage on witness testimony and juror perceptions.  Law and Human Behavior, 14 (5), 489-509.
  29. Borgida, E., Snyder, M., & Kojetin, B.A. (1991). Recycling attitudes and behavior. CURA Reporter, 21, 11-15.
  30. Young, J., Thomsen, C.J., Borgida, E., Sullivan, J.L., & Aldrich, J.H. (1991).  When self-interest makes a difference:  The role of construct accessibility in political reasoning.  Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 271-296.
  31. Fiske, S.T., Bersoff, D.N., Borgida, E., Deaux, K., & Heilman, M.E. (1991).  Social science research on trial:  The use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins.  American Psychologist, 46, 1049-1060. [Reprinted in Stangor, C. (2000). Stereotypes and prejudice: Essential readings. Psychology Press.]
  32. Frazier, P.A., & Borgida, E. (1992).  Rape trauma syndrome:  A review of case law and psychological research.  Law and Human Behavior, 16, 293-311.  [Reprinted in R. R. Hazelwood & A. W. Burgess (Eds.), Practical aspects of rape investigation:  a multidisciplinary approach.  New York:  CRC Press, 1995.]
  33. Miene, P., Park, R., & Borgida, E. (1992).  Juror decision making and the evaluation of hearsay evidence.  Minnesota Law Review, 76, 683-701.
  34. Kovera, M.B., Borgida, E., Gresham, A., Swim, J., & Gray, E. (1993).  Do child sexual abuse experts hold pro-child beliefs? A survey of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies.  Journal of Traumatic Stress, 6 (3), 1-22.
  35. Fiske, S.T., Bersoff, D.N., Borgida, E., Deaux, K., & Heilman, M.E. (1993).  What constitutes a scientific review?  A majority retort to Barrett and Morris on gender stereotyping.  Law and Human Behavior, 17 (2), 217-233.  [Reprinted in Walsh, M. R. (1997) Women, men, and gender:  Ongoing debates.  New Haven: Yale University Press.]
  36. Fiske, S.T., Bersoff, D.N., Borgida, E., Deaux, K., & Heilman, M.E. (1993).  Accuracy and objectivity on behalf of the APA.  American Psychologist, 48, 55-56.
  37. Swim, J., Borgida, E., & McCoy, K. (1993).  Videotaped vs. in-court witness testimony:  Is protecting the child witness jeopardizing due process?  Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23 (8), 603-631.
  38. Robertson, B.A., Sullivan, J.L., & Borgida, E. (1993).  The political psychology program at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.  Political Psychology, 14 (4), 743-746.
  39. Kojetin, B.A., Borgida, E., & Snyder, M. (1993). Survey topic involvement and nonresponse bias. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods of the American Statistical Association, 2, 838-843.
  40. Rahn, W.M., Aldrich, J.H., & Borgida, E. (1994).  Individual and contextual variations in political candidate appraisal.  American Political Science Review, 88, 193-199.
  41. Rudman, L.A., Gonzales, M.H., & Borgida, E. (1995).  My transplant is my life: Compliance status as a moderator of differential susceptibility to item context effects.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 340-348.
  42. Borgida, E. & Fiske, S.T. (eds.) (1995). Gender stereotyping, sexual harassment, and the law.  Special issue of the Journal of Social Issues, 51 (1).
  43. Borgida, E. & Rudman, L.A. (1995).  Gender and the mainstream.  Contemporary Psychology, 40 (1), 48-49.
  44. Rudman, L.A. & Borgida, E. (1995).  The afterglow of construct accessibility:  The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects.  Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 493-517.
  45. Rudman, L.A., Borgida, E., & Robertson, B. (1995).  Suffering in silence:  Procedural justice versus gender socialization issues in university sexual harassment grievance procedures.  Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17 (4), 519-541.
  46. Borgida, E., Rudman, L.A., & Manteufel, L.L. (1995).  On the courtroom use and misuse of gender stereotyping research.  In E. Borgida & S.T. Fiske (Eds.), Special  issue on gender stereotyping, sexual harassment and the law. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 181-192.
  47. Thomsen, C.J. & Borgida, E. (1996).  Throwing the baby out with the bath water?  Let’s not overstate the overselling of the base rate fallacy.  Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 39-40.
  48. Lavine, H., Sullivan, J.L., Borgida, E., & Thomsen, C.J. (1996).  The relationship of national and personal issue salience to attitude accessibility on foreign and domestic policy issues.  Political Psychology, 17, 293-316.
  49. Morier, D., Borgida, E., & Park, R.C. (1996).  Improving juror comprehension of judicial instructions on the entrapment defense.  Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1838-1866.
  50. Burgess, D. & Borgida, E. (1997) Sexual harassment:  An experimental test of sex-role spillover theory.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 63-75.
  51. Kovera, M.B., Gresham, A.W., Borgida, E., Gray, E., & Regan, P.C. (1997).  Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision-making? A social cognitive analysis.  Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 1-13.
  52. Kovera, M.B. & Borgida, E. (1997).  Expert testimony in child sexual abuse trials: The admissibility of psychological science.  Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 105-129.
  53. Burgess, D. & Borgida E. (1997).  Refining sex-role spillover theory:  The role of gender subtypes and harasser attributions.  Social Cognition, 15, 291-311.
  54. Reidel, E., Wagoner, M.J., Dresel, L., Sullivan, J.L., & Borgida, E.  (1998). Electronic communities: Assessing equality of access in a rural Minnesota community.  Social Science Computer Review, 16, 370-390.
  55. Lavine, H., Thomsen, C.J., Zanna, M.P., & Borgida, E.  (1998). On the primacy of affect in the determination of attitudes and behavior: The moderating role of affective-cognitive ambivalence.  Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 398-421.
  56. Rudman, L. A., Gonzales, M. H., & Borgida, E. (1999).  Mishandling the gift of life: Noncompliance in renal transplant patients.  Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29 (4), 835-852.
  57. Burgess, D. & Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination.  Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(3), 1-28.
  58. Lavine, H. Borgida, E., and Sullivan, J. L. (2000).  On the relationship between attitude involvement and attitude accessibility: Toward a cognitive-motivational model of political information processing.  Political Psychology, 21, 81-106.
  59. Hunt, J.S. & Borgida, E. (2001).  Is that what I said?  Developmental differences in witnesses responses to modifications. Law and Human Behavior, 25(6), 583-603.
  60. Sullivan, J.L., Borgida, E., Jackson, M.S., Riedel, E., Oxendine, A., & Gangl, A. (2002). Social capital and community electronic networks: For-profit vs. for-community approaches. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(5), 868-886.
  61. Borgida, E., Sullivan, J.L., Oxendine, A., Jackson, M.S., Riedel, E., & Gangl, A. (2002). Civic culture meets the digital divide: The role of community electronic networks. Journal of Social Issues, 58 (1), 125-141.
  62. Sullivan, J.L., Borgida, E., Jackson, M.S., Riedel, E., & Oxendine, A.R. (2002). A tale of two towns: Assessing the role of political resources in a community electronic network. Political Behavior, 24 (1), 55-84.
  63. Riedel, E., Gangl, A., Oxendine, A., Jackson, M., Sullivan, J.L., & Borgida, E. (2003). The role of the Internet in national and local news media use. Journal of On-Line Behavior, 1(3). http://www.behavior.net/JOB/v1n3/riedel.htm.
  64. Oxendine, A., Borgida, E., Sullivan, J.L., & Jackson, M.S. (2003). The importance of trust and community in developing and maintaining a community electronic network. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 671-696.
  65. Borgida, E. & Stark, E. (2004). New media and politics: Some insights from social and political psychology. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(4), 467-478.
  66. Oyamot, C.M. Jr., Borgida, E., & Fisher, E.L. (2006). Can values moderate the attitudes of Right-Wing Authoritarians? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(4), 486-500.
  67. Borgida, E., Hunt, C., & Kim, A. (2005). On the use of gender stereotyping research in sex discrimination litigation. Journal of Law and Policy, XIII (2), 613-628.
  68. Oxendine, A., Sullivan, J.L., Borgida, E., Riedel, E., Jackson, M., & Dial, J. (2007). The importance of political context for understanding civic engagement: A longitudinal analysis. Political Behavior, 29, 31-67.
  69. Borgida, E., Druckman, J.N., Rahn, W., & Sullivan, J.L. (2005). Farewell from the Minnesota editorial team. Political Psychology, 26(6), 985-987.
  70. Hatsukami, D.K., Joseph, A.M., LeSage, M., Jensen, J., Murphy, S.E., Pentel, P.R., Kotlyar, M., Borgida, E., Le, C., & Hecht, S.S. (2007). Developing the science base for reducing tobacco harm. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 9 (Supplement 4), S537-S553.
  71. Stark, E., Kim, A., Miller, C. & Borgida, E. (2008). Effects of including a graphic warning label in advertisements for reduced exposure tobacco products: Implications for persuasion and policy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(2), 281-93.
  72. Borgida, E., & Deason, G. (2007). North Country: A landmark legal case goes to Hollywood. PsycCRITIQUES-Contemporary Psychology: APA Review of Books, 52, Article 187.
  73. Stark, E., Borgida, E., Kim, A., & Pickens, B. (2008). Understanding public attitudes toward tobacco harm reduction: The role of attitude structure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(10), 2615-2635.
  74. Ergun, D., Deason, G., Borgida, E., & Charles, G. (2008). Race and redistricting: What the print media conveys to the public about the role of race. Journal of Social Issues, 64(3), 619-637.
  75. Borgida, E., Worth, K.A., Lippmann, B., Ergun, D., & Farr, J. (2008). Beliefs about deliberation: Personal and normative dimensions. Journal of Social Issues, 64(3), 551-570.
  76. Fiske, S.T. & Borgida, E. (2008). Providing expert knowledge for the legal system: Social science in an adversary context. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 4, 123-148.
  77. Borgida, E., Deason, G., Kim, A., & Fiske, S.T. (2008). Stereotyping research and employment discrimination: Time to see the forest for the trees. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on science and practice, 1(4), 405-408.
  78. Hunt, C.V., Kim, A., Borgida, E., & Chaiken, S. (2010). Revisiting the self-interest versus values debate: The role of temporal perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1155-1158.
  79. Fisher, E.L., Deason, G., Borgida, E., & Oyamot, C. (2011). A model of authoritarianism, social norms, and personal values: Implications for Arizona law enforcement and immigration policy. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 11(1), 285-299.
  80. Kim, A., Borgida, E., & Stark, E. (2011). Symbolic politics and the prediction of attitudes toward federal regulation of reduced-exposure tobacco products. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(2), 407-426.
  81. Fiske, S.T. & Borgida, E. (2011). Standards for using social psychological evidence in employment discrimination cases. Temple Law Review, 83, 867-876.
  82. Fiske, S.T. & Borgida, E. (2011). Best practices: How to evaluate psychological science for use by organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 253-275.
  83. Borgida, E., & Miller, A.L. (2013) Implicit and explicit measurement approaches to research on policy implementation: The case of race-based disparities in criminal justice. PS: Political Science & Politics, 46(3), 532-536.
  84. Oyamot, C.M., Jr., Fisher, E.L., Deason, G., & Borgida, E. (2012). Attitudes toward immigrants: The interactive role of the authoritarian predisposition, social norms, and humanitarian values. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 97-105.
  85. Fisher, E. & Borgida, E. (2012). Intergroup disparities and implicit bias: A commentary. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 385-398.
  86. Borgida, E., & Miller, A.L. (2013) Implicit and explicit measurement approaches to research on policy implementation: The case of race-based disparities in criminal justice. PS: Political Science & Politics, 46(3), 532-536.
  87. Chen, P.G., Appleby, J. Borgida, E., Callaghan, T.H., Ekstrom, P.,Farhart, C.E.,  Housholder, E., Kim, H., Ksiazkiewicz, A., Lavine, H., Luttig, M.D., Mohanty, R., Rosenthal, A., Sheagley, G., Smith, B.A.,Vitriol, J.A., & Williams, A. (2014). The Minnesota multi-investigator 2012 Presidential election panel study. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, Special Issue on the Social Psychology of the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election, 14(1), 78-104.
  88. Fiske, S.T., Borgida, E., & Major, B. (Eds.) (2014). Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences (PIBBS). Inaugural issue on social and personality psychology.
  89. Borgida, E. (in press). Reflections of a Schachter grandson working under the voodoo spell of Lewinian action research. Journal of Social Issues.
  90. Girvan, E.J., Deason, G., & Borgida, E. (2015). The generalizability of gender bias: Testing the effects of contextual, explicit, and implicit sexism on labor arbitration decisions. Law and Human Behavior, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000139. Also see: http://law.missouri.edu/arbitrationinfo/2016/05/03/girvan-deason-and-borgida-on-implicit-gender-bias-on-labor-arbitration-decision/
  91. Miller, A.L., & Borgida, E. (2016) Moral typecasting underlies punitive responses to crime. Law and Human Behavior, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000210.
  92. Miller A.L, & Borgida, E. (2016) The Separate Spheres Model of Gendered Inequality. PLoS ONE 11(1): e0147315. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147315
  93. Borgida, E., Loken, B., Williams, A.L., Vitriol, J., Stepanov, I., & Hatsukami, D. (2015). Assessing constituent levels in smokeless tobacco products: A new approach to engaging and educating the public. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 17(11), 1354-1361. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv007.
  94. Oyamot, C.M. Jr., Jackson, M.S., Fisher, E.L., Deason, G., & Borgida, E.  (2017). Social norms and egalitarian values mitigate authoritarian intolerance toward sexual minorities. Political Psychology, 38(5), 777-794.
  95. Andow, D.A., Borgida, E., Hurley, T.M., & Williams, A.L. (2016). Recruitment and retention of volunteers in a citizen science network to detect invasive species on private lands. Environmental Management. DOI 10.1007/s00267-016-0746-7.
  96. Vitriol, J.A., Appleby, J., & Borgida, E. (2019). Racial bias increases false identification of black suspects in simultaneous lineups. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(6), 722-734.
  97. Tylczak, L., Andow, D., Borgida, E., Hurley, T., & Williams, A. (2015). Design clarity in public outreach documents: A guidebook for a first detector volunteer network. Journal of Extension, 53(2), article #2TOT3 (www.joe.org).
  98. Miller, A.L., & Borgida, E. (2019).  The temporal dimension of system justification: Gender ideology over the course of the 2016 election. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(7), 1057-1067. doi.org/10.1177/0146167218804547.
  99. Clatch, L., Walters, A., & Borgida, E. (2020). How interdisciplinary? Taking stock of decision-making research at the intersection of psychology and law. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 541-561.
  100. Zweigenhaft, R.L., & Borgida, E. (2018). Review of “Scientists making a difference: One hundred eminent behavioral and brain scientists talk about their most important contributions.” American Journal of Psychology, 131(2), 256-259.
  101. Bai, H., Euh, H., Federico, C.M., & Borgida, E. (2021). Thou shall not kill, unless it is not a human: Target dehumanization may make decisions for moral dilemmas easier and less deontological in response pattern. Social Cognition, 39(6), 657-686.
  102. Bu, W., & Borgida, E. (forthcoming, Politics, Groups, and Identities). Attention check effects on responses to racial attitude measures.
  103. Bu, W., & Borgida, E. (2021). A 4-dimensional model of Asian American stereotypes. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 24(8), 1262-1283. DOI:10.1177/13684302209.36.360.
  104. Loken, B., Borgida, E., Wang, T., Madzelan, M.K., Williams, A.L., Hatsukami, D., & Stepanov, I. (2021). Nicotine & Tobacco Research. Can the public be educated about constituents in smokeless tobacco? A three-wave randomized control trial. 23(1), 161-170. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz241.
  105. Vitriol, J.A., Lavine, H., & Borgida, E. (2020). Meta-cognition and resistance to political persuasion: Evidence from a three-wave panel study. Social Influence, 15(1), 17-33.
  106. Clatch, L., & Borgida, E. (2021). Plea bargaining: A novel test of dual discounting preferences in a non-monetary loss context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(7), 1039-1056. doi:10.1177/01461672209522.28.
  107. Clatch, L., & Borgida, E. (2022). Behavioral economics in plea-bargain decision-making: Beyond the shadow-of-trial model. Review of Law & Economics, 17(2), 349-383.
  108. Borgida, E., & Walters, A. (in press). Gender bias in the legal system. Oxford Bibliographies in Psychology.
Scroll to Top